Medical Advocates for Social Justice
Conference Abstract


5th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection
Glasgow, Scotland, October 22-26, 2000

Interpretation of Genotypic Resistance to ABT-378/Ritonavir (ABT-378/r) in Protease Inhibitor Experienced Patients Using the ABT-378 Mutation Score

DJ. Kempf, J Isaacson, M King, R Rode, S Brun, Y Xu, K Real,
A Hsu, GR Granneman, B Bernstein, E Sun



 


SHARE THIS ABSTRACT WITH A COLLEAGUE   

The use of genotypic resistance testing to meaningfully guide therapy in treatment-experienced patients requires its interpretation in a clinically relevant context . With many current protease inhibitor (PI) regimens, the presence of 1-2 key protease mutations is associated with diminished response. ABT-378/r is a new protease inhibitor that, by virtue of a high inhibitory quotient (IQ, defined as the Ctrough/serum-adjusted EC50 ratio) against wt HIV has shown activity in patients with multiple protease mutations. Previous studies have identified 11 mutations (L10F/I/R/V, K20M/R, L24I, M46I/L, F53L, I54L/T/V, L63P, A71I/L/T/V, V82A/F/T, I84V and L90M) associated with changes in susceptibility to ABT-378. In order to investigate the clinical significance of genotypic resistance testing with ABT-378/r, we performed a cross-study analysis of the Week 24 response in two Phase II studies of ABT-378/r plus an NNRTI and NRTIs in PI-experienced, NNRTI-naïve patients, with respect to the number of the above mutations at baseline (ABT-378 mutation score). Baseline genotype was determined by population sequencing, and the association between the baseline ABT-378 mutation score and the binary response variable (HIV RNA > or <400 copies/mL) at Week 24 (dropouts as censored) was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and univariate logistic regression. The median (range) baseline ABT-378 mutation score (n=116 patients) was 4 (0-10). Observed response rates at Week 24 (n=109, dropouts as censored) for patients with 0-5, 6-7 and 8-10 baseline mutations were 70/77 (91%), 21/26 (81%) and 2/6 (33%) (p=0.0015). Using the lower (conservative) 95% confidence limit of a logistic regression model, the estimated probability of response at Week 24 was 50% or greater in subjects with baseline ABT-378 mutation scores of 7 or less. These results suggest that clinically relevant resistance to ABT-378/r, as used in these studies, can be estimated by the baseline ABT-378 mutation score: the presence of 8 or more mutations may substantially compromise response. The number of protease mutations, rather than the presence of any single key mutation, is the best genotypic predictor of virologic response. These results may be useful to guide the interpretation of genotypic resistance testing with ABT-378/r.


Glasgow Conference Index Kaletra Conference Data Home

Interpretation of Genotypic Resistance to ABT-378/Ritonavir (ABT-378/r)
in Protease Inhibitor Experienced Patients Using the ABT-378 Mutation Score


© 2000 Medical Advocates for Social Justice