Medical Advocates for Social Justice
Conference
Poster


5th International Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection
Glasgow, Scotland, October 22-26, 2000

Lack of Resistance to Kaletra formerly known as ABT-378/r) Observed Through 24 Weeks of Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naïve Subjects

Bernstein B, Kempf D, Moseley J, et al.




 


SHARE THIS POSTER WITH A COLLEAGUE   

BACKGROUND  

ABT-378/r is a novel HIV protease inhibitor (PI) that has shown significant antiviral activity and tolerability in clinical trials to date. ABT-378/r is co-formulated with ritonavir, an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A. It is uniquely sensitive to pharmacokinetic enhancement by ritonavir, resulting in substantially increased ABT-378 drug exposure, even at low ritonavir doses. The mean ABT-378 C trough /EC 50 ratio (inhibitory quotient or IQ) for wild-type HIV is >75 when dosed at 400/100 mg BID, contributing to durability and potentially providing a pharmacologic barrier to the emergence of viral resistance. 1 The efficacy and safety of ABT-378/r are currently being studied in both antiretroviral-naïve and PI-experienced HIV-infected subjects. Study M98-863 further examines the antiviral activity of ABT-378/r in a large, blinded, randomized, prospective study comparing the activity and safety of ABT-378/r to that of nelfinavir (NFV). 

At Week 24, 92% of ABT-378/r-treated subjects and 81% of NFV-treated subjects had viral load (VL) <400 copies/mL (on treatment, p<0.001). In order to gain insight into the development of resistance in subjects receiving ABT-378/r, the plasma viral isolates from all subjects with VL >400 copies/mL while on treatment at Week 24 (ABT-378/r: n=25. NFV: n=54) were examined for viral resistance. 

METHODS 

  • Genotype (population sequencing) and phenotype (PhenoSense™) were performed by Virologic, Inc. 

  • Resistance to NFV was defined as the presence of a D30N and/or an L90M mutation in protease. Resistance to ABT-378 was defined as the presence of any primary or active site mutation. 2 Genotypic analysis was performed on all samples. Phenotypic analysis was also conducted on each Week 24 sample from ABT-378/r-treated subjects. Resistance to 3TC was defined as the presence of an M184V/I mutation in reverse transcriptase. 

  • Adherence was measured by protease inhibitor pill count of returned capsules at each visit. Overall adherence was defined as the percentage of capsules taken (relative to the number specified by the protocol) over the first 24 weeks. Adherence was also computed between monthly visits, and the “minimum adherence rate” was defined as the lowest of the monthly adherence rates. 

  • P-values were computed using Fisher’s exact test or Pearson’s chi-square test. Adults (Week 36-96) Children (Week 24-32) Naïve subjects enrolled in study n=100 n=44 Subjects with resistance data following rebound 4 8 Subjects genotype resistant to ABT-378 0 0 Subjects resistant to 3TC 2/4 2/8 Subjects with a resuppression after rebound 2/4 6/8 Viral Resistance in Other Naïve Subjects Table 6. Other Resistance Data from Naïve Subjects in Phase II Studies 

RESULTS

Incidence of Resistance in Viral Isolates from M98-863 Subjects at Week 24

At Week 24, plasma viral isolates from all subjects with VL >400 copies/mL were examined for evidence of PI-resistance (Table 1).

  • Among subjects whose VL were >400 copies/mL at Week 24, 24/25 ABT-378/r-treated and 51/54 NFV-treated subjects had a viral load reduction from baseline of >2.0 log 10 copies/mL or a VL <400 copies/mL at some point prior to Week 24.

  • Viral resuppression was significantly more common in ABT-378/r-treated subjects than in NFV-treated subjects; 74% of ABT-378/r-treated subjects demonstrated resuppression at least once compared to 22% of NFV-treated subjects.
  • In spite of the presence of 3TC resistance, 4/8 (50%) ABT-378/r-treated subjects experienced viral resuppression compared to 3/21 (14%) NFV-treated subjects.
  • None of the NFV-treated subjects who demonstrated a D30N or L90M protease mutation at Week 24 experienced viral suppression at any time point after Week 24.

Table 3. M98-863: Baseline and Week 24 Genotype Comparison for ABT-378/r-Treated Subjects*

R E S U L T S

* Blue texts indicate mutations not present in both Baseline and Week 24 sequences.

Adherence

Viral Resistance in Other Naïve Subjects

  • Resistance testing from antiretroviral-naïve subjects treated with ABT-378/r in phase II studies has demonstrated results similar to those seen in this phase III study.
  • All subjects received 3TC in both studies. Among antiretroviral-naïve subjects with genotype data available, 2/4 adult subjects and 2/8 pediatric subjects showed 3TC resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

  • ABT-378/r is a new PI that displays significant virologic potency in treatment-naïve subjects. To date, no viral resistance to ABT-378 has been observed in subjects who initiated their antiretroviral therapy with ABT-378/r.
  • In contrast, 15/40 NFV-treated subjects developed NFV resistance by Week 24. 
  • 3TC resistance was significantly more common in NFV-treated subjects than in ABT-378/r-treated subjects (90% vs. 44%).
  • The absence of resistance in naïve subjects treated with ABT-378/r is consistent with its high inhibitory quotient (C trough /EC 50 ratio) and suggests a high barrier to resistance.

REFERENCE

  1. Bertz R, Lam W, Brun S, et al. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK) of ABT-378/ritonavir (ABT-378/r) in HIV+ subjects. 39th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, San Francisco, USA, 1999 (Abstract 0327).
  2. Hirsch, MS, et al. Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adults with HIV infection: implications for clinical management. International AIDS Society–USA Panel. JAMA 1998;279:1984-91.


Glasgow Conference Index Kaletra Conference Data Home

   Lack of Resistance to Kaletra formerly known as ABT-378/r) Observed Through 24 Weeks of Therapy in Antiretroviral-Naïve Subjects

© 2000 Medical Advocates for Social Justice