Medical Advocates for Social Justice


Medical Advoates for Social Justice
Acción Solidari

  Abstract: ATTITUDES OF THE LEBANESE PUBLIC REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF SERIOUS ILLNESS

Adib SM & Hamadeh GN

J Med Ethics 1999; 25:399-403

Arch Intern Med 2000 Jun 12;160(11):1659-64


ABSTRACT

Objectives: To measure the preference to be told of a serious diagnosis, and its determinants, in the Lebanese public.  

Design and setting: Non-random sample survey of 400 persons interviewed in health-care facilities in Beirut in 1995. 

Results: Forty-two per cent of respondents generally preferred truth not to be disclosed directly to patients.  Preference for disclosure was associated with younger age, better education and tendency to rapport-building with physicians.  There were no meaningful associations between place of residence (urban/rural), level of religious practice, or religious affiliation, and preference for disclosure. 

Conclusions: Under one plausible interpretation, this survey suggests that the expectation for concealment will decrease as the advantage of knowledge in better coping with disease is understood by an increasingly better educated public, and that the Lebanese public will increasingly come to expect direct and full disclosure of serious diagnoses.

 

Home Page

Ethics: Duties

Dr. Adib’s  Profile

 
Abstract:  ATTITUDES OF THE LEBANESE PUBLIC REGARDING DISCLOSURE OF SERIOUS ILLNESS
 HTML© 2001 Medical Advocates for Social Justice
Email: [email protected]