Background:
HIV status disclosure is receiving increasing
emphasis in Seattle area public health prevention efforts through
encouraging negative men to ask partners about their HIV status and positive
men to disclose prior to sex.
Objectives:
To explore the use and mis-use of HIV status
disclosure as a prevention tool among MSM, facilitators and barriers to
discussing status, and behavior change after status disclosure.
Methods:
Recently diagnosed HIV+ MSM and MSM who tested
HIV- were recruited from Seattle-area public HIV testing sites between 6/02
and 8/03 as part of the ongoing Seattle Area MSM Study. The prevalence of
HIV status disclosure was obtained from Audio Computer Administered
Self-Interviews (ACASI). Content analysis of qualitative interviews obtained
main reasons for and against asking about status and behavior change after
status disclosure.
Results:
Eighty-eight participants were included in this
analysis, including 28 newly-diagnosed HIV+ and 60 HIVMSM. Median age was 33
and median number of recent sex partners was 5. Sixty-one percent discussed
HIV status with their most recent anal sex partner; only 33% knew this
partner’s status before sex. According to qualitative interviews, the status
information was often distorted and/or ignored by the participant, leading
to unprotected sex. Primary barriers to status discussion included sexual
desire, lack of communication with anonymous partners, and doubting the
veracity of disclosure. Primary facilitators included having the partner
initiate discussion, developing a relationship with the partner, and having
internal motivation and skills to ask.
Conclusions:
In this analysis a minority of participants
learned of their partners’ HIV statuses before sex. Among many, HIV status
disclosure alone was not sufficient to affect sexual risk behaviors.
slides (.1 MB),
web cast |