|
Joseph Paris, MD, Medical Director for the
Georgia
Department of Corrections, wears many hats ,serving as a physician,
administrator, accountant and even a politician in some instances. As a
correctional medical director, Paris is never quite sure what role he
will have to assume on a given day, especially when dealing with
hepatitis C (HCV). Paris, though, always pays close attention to
what he calls “the numbers,” calculating costs at every turn.
“You
are going to see a lot of numbers here,” Paris says before explaining
the DOC’s HCV treatment protocol. “The numbers come from the fact that
if you don’t do the numbers, your program stalls. Paris describes the
Georgia
DOC
as a “lot of prisons with a lot of inmates and lots of new faces every
year.” The DOC operates 79 sites throughout the state and holds 46,461
inmates, 3,000 of whom are females. About one third of that
number—17,000 inmates—leave the system on a yearly basis and a similar
number enter on an annual basis.
The
first dilemma for any prison system confronting HCV care is whether to
conduct universal or targeted HCV testing. The
Georgia
DOC,
like many other prison systems, conducts targeted testing of incoming
inmates, believing that the vast majority of inmates with HCV can be
identified through targeted testing based on risk assessment questions.
About 50 percent of the DOC’s new arrivals—about 8,500 inmates—are
believed to be at risk for HCV, with about 2,550 testing positive for
the disease every year.
“Anyone who tests positive is counseled,” explains Paris. “We will
explain what the condition means, the risks of treatment and of
non-treatment and the prognosis.” All HCV positive inmates are offered
vaccinations for hepatitis A and B. It is interesting to note that the
Georgia DOC spends $558,200 a year on vaccinations for hepatitis A and B
before performing a single biopsy or treating a single patient for HCV.
Three
Categories
Paris
said HCV positive inmates generally fall into three categories— those
who eschew treatment, those who are neutral about treatment and those
who demand treatment.
“We
have to tailor our approach to who we are seeing,” Paris said .From the
outset, treatment candidates must have at least two years left on their
sentences so that they can start and finish treatment inside of
prison.
“We
may end up spending four or five months from the first test to the
repeat test to the PCRs to the biopsy and then the counseling,” Paris
exp lains. “Then in most cases, we need one year to treat and then we
need six months to follow up.”
The
Georgia
DOC
has a long list of exclusionary criteria, refusing to offer treatment to
inmates with uncontrolled depression, co-infection with uncontrolled HIV
disease, uncontrolled hyperthyroidism and evidence of autoimmune
disease.
Georgia
also
does not treat inmates with platelet counts less than 100,000 or
evidence of prior organ transplants. In addition, officials require
\inmates to undergo biopsies before treatment; those refusing are
excluded from treatment consideration at least until they agree to a
biopsy. Unlike many other prison systems, the
Georgia
DOC
does not exclude inmates on the basis of drug or alcohol use and does
not require enrollment in a drug abuse program.
In
the
Georgia
DOC,
there is little drug use among inmates, Paris says. “In well run
prison systems, if there are drugs, it is because the staff is selling
them,” Paris explains. “They always get caught and they always get
fired.” Without the temptation of drugs, inmates will attend drug
treatment programs saying they are reformed and vowing never to use
drugs again even though their statements mean little because illicit
drugs are not readily available.
“Drug
programs are welcome but are not a pre-condition for treatment in the
Georgia
DOC,”
Paris says. The DOC’s exclusionary criteria eliminates about 65 percent
of the 2,500 inmates who test positive for HCV in a given year, leaving
about 892 inmates who are biopsy candidates.
In
practice, the
Georgia
DOC
has been performing 400 biopsies a year at a cost of $1,500 each, which
amounts to $600,000 annually. To recap, the DOC will have spent $353,600
annually on HCV testing, another $234,600 on yearly vaccination costs
and $600,000 on biopsies, generating a total cost of $1,188,200.000. And
as Paris points out, “That is before treating anyone.”
Evaluating Treatment
The
Georgia
DOC
treats inmates with stage 3 fibrosis and some inmates with stage 2,
deferring treatment for inmates with stage 0 to 1 and those with
decompensated cirrhosis, manifested by a fibrosis score of 4. Of the 400
biopsies performed ever year, 40 percent or 160 inmates will qualify for
treatment based on their biopsy scores. DOC physicians will then conduct
genotype tests on those 160 inmates to determine their genotype, which
determines length of treatment and treatment response rates. Typically,
80 percent or 128 of those 160 inmates will have genotype 1a/b, which
requires a year of treatment and responds least effectively to
treatment. The other 32 inmates have other genotypes, requiring six
months of treatment.
Medical staff check the response rates of inmates with genotypes 1a/b
and non-1a/b at 12 weeks, dropping those who are non-responders. It is
expected that 77 of the 128 inmates with genotype 1a/b respond to
therapy by the end of the 12th week. These inmates are, in turn,
approved to complete a year of therapy. In the non-1 a/b group, 26
inmates respond by the end of the 12-week period and are thus cleared to
complete 24 weeks of therapy. A program of this scope may cost the
Georgia DOC a grand total of nearly $3 million for the testing,
evaluation and treatment of inmates with HCV.
Paris
describes HCV “as a very complicated puzzle,” explaining that
corrections is often left to treat inmates with advanced or end stage
liver disease. The
Georgia
DOC
averaged three deaths a year from HCV related end stage liver disease a
few years ago, but is now averaging eight or nine deaths a year as a
result of HCV. That figure will probably peak at about 30 a year within
two or three years, predicts Paris.
“The
morbidity and mortality we are seeing is likely from patients who have
been infected for decades,” comments Paris.
Treatment Results
During a three-year period, from 1999 to 2002, the
Georgia
DOC
started 105 inmates on
treatment, treating 7 with interferon monotherapy and 78 with Rebetron.
(The DOC did not start using pegylated interferon with ribavirin until
March of 2003.) Paris reported that 8 left the DOC unexpectedly and were
able to receive after care, and 12 had to stop due to side effects,
leaving 85 in treatment. Thirty-five or about 40 percent of those
patients failed to respond or clear the virus before the end of
treatment. Fifty inmates or 59 percent cleared the virus by the end of
treatment but 15 inmates relapsed by the end of the six-month follow-up,
leaving 35 inmates who achieved a sustained viral response.
It should be pointed out, however, that some providers
believe HCV treatment slows and even reverses disease progression in
many cases, making treatment beneficial even if it does not result in a
cure. Many providers are also convinced that HCV education and
counseling plays a pivotal role in reducing HCV infection rates,
resulting in long term benefits that can not always be measured in
dollars and cents.
“Someone could say that Georgia spent $3 million
and cured 35 people, disregarding the fact that much of the money was
spent in testing, vaccinations and counseling of many more individuals
at risk,” said Paris. “Analyzed in this manner, it gives the appearance
that each cure cost $93,000.”
Paris predicts, though, that with steady improvements in
therapy, the cost of treating HCV will be “reduced very soon.”“How
much is a cure worth?” he asks. “How much is hope worth?”+ |
|